Skip to content
Draft concept by Danilo Vicioso, not affiliated with Soylent.
Let's chat

Growth plan for Soylent, 7 Oct 2026

Scale spend. Hold CAC.

Soylent has 9,907 Reviews on one rating and subscription savings of up to 29%. My plan turns that into creator videos and 12 new ads a week, with one number to protect: a target CAC of $60.48.

Soylent
Target CAC
$60.48
New ads a week at peak
20
Creators live by week six
10
Test spend, six weeks
$24,000

01 The number

One number to protect: $60.48 CAC, not clicks on a $48.00 pack

The one number to protect is a target CAC of $60.48. It is 0.6 of the $100.80 ceiling, so a bad week still leaves room. Soylent sells a $48.00 original pack and $133.00 bundles; every winning ad has to clear the line on both.

Protect

Target CAC: $60.48 on a first purchase

Ceiling = average order × margin × (1 + repeat orders): $126 × 40% × (1 + 1) = $100.80. Guard line = 0.6 × $100.80 = $60.48. Across the ranges: $1.05 to $870.75.

Three moves

  1. Kill losing ads early, before any single test spends past $250.
  2. Put creator videos ahead of the 12 weekly ads so the hook library grows with each test.
  3. Report daily CAC against the $60.48 guard line and pause anything that sits above it.
Reviews shown on one Soylent rating
9,907
Published
Top subscription saving shown (up to)
29%
Published
Free shipping threshold on orders over
$50
Published

02 Variety

Variety: each Soylent flavor and plan is its own ad concept

Each ad concept has to carry one reason to buy and one proof Soylent already owns: a flavor, a review count, a subscribe saving or the free shipping line. Same product, different person watching. One variable per test, so a loser tells us which part failed.

Reasons to buy, proof and creative count
Reason to buyProof you already haveAds (proposed)
Complete nutrition28 vitamins & minerals9
Five star reviewsover 14,000 five star reviews!2
Coffee as breakfastcoffee that acts like a healthy breakfast.2
Subscribe and saveSubscribe and save up to 29% on every order2
Just add watercomplete meal - just add water? yep. it's that easy.1
Smart energysmart energy. fuel for the brain and the body.1
First order discountSIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER AND GET 25% OFF YOUR FIRST ORDER!1
TotalThe ad concepts tab18
Soylent
Soylent

Each row is a reason to buy that the brand already has proof for. The count is how many of the ads carry it: a reason with a single ad is a bet, not a pattern, and the next batch of concepts moves toward the reasons that win.

03 Disturbances

Risks: free shipping over $50 and prepaid plans can break CAC

Risks with likelihood, impact, owner and gate
DisturbanceLikelihoodImpactOwnerGate (proposed)
A single $48.00 pack sits under the free shipping line, so first-order CAC runs hotMedHighBothIf first-order CAC stays above $60.48 for a full week, tests move to bundles
Subscribe savings read 10%, 14%, 25% and 29%, so an ad can promise the wrong oneMedMedYour teamEvery ad claim matches the claims sheet before launch; a mismatch pauses the ad the same day
A creator video claims what a Soylent meal does for the bodyMedHighMeEach video is checked against the claims sheet before posting; a breach pauses that creator
Subscribe and one-time orders are not tracked apart, so CAC is blurredHighHighYour teamEvents split by order type are live in Week 1; no spend scaling before that
A winning ad tires as spend climbs toward $100,000MedMedMeIf a winner's CAC tops $60.48 for three days, the next concept replaces it
Repeat orders come in below the guess behind the $100.80 ceilingMedHighBothWeek one data replaces the guess; weaker repeats mean the ceiling is rebuilt before spend grows
Creators do not join at two a weekMedMedMeIf fewer than 6 creators are live by week four, new ads hold at 12 a week

Scores are my read from outside the company, re-scored in week one with your data. Each risk has one owner and one gate that can be checked with a number, so nobody has to argue about whether it happened.

04 The ceiling

The ceiling is $100.80, built on a $126 average order

Unit economics lines
LineValueStatus
Average order$126 (range $2.00–$645.00)Assumption Range from the site product prices (Published); the midpoint is a guess
Gross margin40% (range 35–45%)Assumption Replace in week one
Repeat orders after the first1 (range 0.5–2)Assumption Replace with cohort data in week one
Margin per customer, all orders$100.80Calculated Average order × margin × (1 + repeat orders)
Guard line for CAC$60.48Calculated 0.6 × the margin per customer

The math, with the assumed lines

Ceiling = average order × margin × (1 + repeat orders): $126 × 40% × (1 + 1) = $100.80. Guard line = 0.6 × $100.80 = $60.48. Across the ranges: $1.05 to $870.75.

Range across the assumptions: $1 to $871.

The $100.80 ceiling uses a $126 average order, a 40% margin and one repeat order. Only the $126.00 prepaid 3 month price exists as a fact; the rest are guesses. Week one replaces them.

The ceiling is a range, not one number: the most a new customer can cost before shipping and packaging, which I do not have. Replace the guessed lines with yours and every figure below recalculates.

05 Test ramp

Six weeks of tests cost $24,000 before any budget scales

Test ramp by week
WeekNew ads × budget / ad (proposed)Weekly test spendCumulativeCreators postingCAC target (proposed)
112 × $250$3,000$3,0000$60
212 × $250$3,000$6,0002$60
312–20 × $250$4,000$10,0004$60
412–20 × $250$4,000$14,0006$60
520 × $250$5,000$19,0008$60
620 × $250$5,000$24,00010$60

Week 1 and week 2 run 12 ads at $250 each, $3,000 a week. Weeks 3 and 4 run 12–20 ads, $4,000 a week. Weeks 5 and 6 run 20 ads, $5,000 a week. Total $24,000 of tests, with losers killed early, before the $100,000 moves.

Cumulative test spend, week by week (proposed): $24,000 by week 6
  1. $3,000Wk 1
  2. $6,000Wk 2
  3. $10,000Wk 3
  4. $14,000Wk 4
  5. $19,000Wk 5
  6. $24,000Wk 6

The math. Week 1: 12 × $250 = $3,000; Week 2: 12 × $250 = $3,000; Week 3: 16 × $250 = $4,000; Week 4: 16 × $250 = $4,000; Week 5: 20 × $250 = $5,000; Week 6: 20 × $250 = $5,000. Total $24,000 (96 ads × $250). A range such as 12–20 counts as its midpoint.

Weeks one and two test what the brand already has, rewritten per reason to buy. From week three, creator videos enter paid only after they beat their own account median. A range of new ads counts as its midpoint in the spend column.

06 Volume

More Soylent concepts, more winners: 80 add $72,000 monthly

Soylent sells flavors, variety packs and powders, so one concept never fits all. At 20 concepts the guess is 2 winners and $18,000 of added monthly spend; at 80 concepts, 8 winners and $72,000. Hit rate and spend per winner are guesses.

Concepts, hit rate and added spend
Concepts tested / monthHit rate (assumed)New winners / monthSpend each winner holds (assumed)Added spend at target CAC
2010%2$300 / day$18,000 / month
4010%4$300 / day$36,000 / month
6010%6$300 / day$54,000 / month
8010%8$300 / day$72,000 / month

The math. 20 concepts × 10% = 2 winners × $300 × 30 days = $18,000 a month; 40 concepts × 10% = 4 winners × $300 × 30 days = $36,000 a month; 60 concepts × 10% = 6 winners × $300 × 30 days = $54,000 a month; 80 concepts × 10% = 8 winners × $300 × 30 days = $72,000 a month.

The hit rate and the spend each winner holds are placeholders. The first thirty days of tests replace them with real numbers, and the table is recalculated the same day.

07 Allocation

The $100,000 follows the winners, not the flavor list

Six weeks of tests, the $24,000 ramp
$24,000
24%
Scaling winners that hold the $60.48 line
$46,000
46%
Creator pay and product for videos
$20,000
20%
Landing pages and tracking fixes
$10,000
10%

Of the $100,000, this split is my call; if winners keep holding the line, scaling takes spend from tests, not the other way round.

The math. 24% × $100,000 = $24,000; 46% × $100,000 = $46,000; 20% × $100,000 = $20,000; 10% × $100,000 = $10,000. Sum 100% = $100,000.

This split is a proposal. It moves toward scaling as winners prove out, and toward testing when fatigue shows.

08 Channels

Meta first, then the channels where Soylent's reviews can travel

Channels and opening conditions
ChannelOpen when (proposed)Why wait
MetaWeek 1, with 12 new adsFast tests on flavors, reviews and the subscribe saving; 9,907 Reviews give each ad proof.
TikTokWhen creator videos clear the CAC guard line on MetaDesk-lunch and gym-shaker videos suit a feed built for short clips.
YouTube ShortsAfter the first creator videos show a winning hookThe same vertical videos get reused; no new shoot needed for extra reach.
EmailWhen Meta brings enough first-time buyers to follow upThe newsletter already offers 25% off the first order, a route to repeat orders.
Google SearchAfter Meta shows which Soylent claims convertBrand and flavor searches carry intent; worth it once the winning claims are known.

A channel opens when its condition is true, not when the calendar says so. Until then the budget stays where the CAC is earned.

09 Payback

Payback: a $60 CAC works after repeat orders, $110 never does

Payback is the real constraint. With a $100.80 ceiling, a $30 CAC leaves $70.80 on the first order. A $60 CAC pays back only after repeat orders, leaving $40.80. At $110 it is never, −$9.20 left: stop. Prepaid 3 month and 6 month plans pull repeat money forward.

Margin left per customer, order by order (assumed midpoint, before CAC)
  1. $50.40Order 1
  2. $100.80Order 2

Cumulative margin per customer, order by order, before CAC: $50.40, $100.80.

CAC scenarios and payback
CAC (scenario)First-order marginYear-one marginLeft after CACPayback
$30$50.40$100.80$70.80First order
$60$50.40$100.80$40.80After repeat orders
$110$50.40$100.80−$9.20Never: stop
$140$50.40$100.80−$39.20Never: stop

The math. CAC $30: $100.80 − $30 = $70.80 left; pays back: First order; CAC $60: $100.80 − $60 = $40.80 left; pays back: After repeat orders; CAC $110: $100.80 − $110 = −$9.20 left; pays back: Never: stop; CAC $140: $100.80 − $140 = −$39.20 left; pays back: Never: stop.

Read each row left to right: the margin of the first purchase, the margin over the whole horizon, what is left after CAC, and the purchase on which the CAC is earned back. A scenario that never pays back is a stop, not a test.

10 Scope

Scope: I run ads and creators; Soylent keeps its product claims

Covers

  • Meta ad testing on Soylent's meal, protein and coffee lines
  • The creator program: recruiting, briefs, pay and the hook library
  • Landing pages for each winning concept, built with your team
  • Daily CAC, weekly learnings, monthly cohort payback

Doesn’t

  • Event tracking and site code; I spec it, your team builds it
  • Product, pricing and the claims behind Soylent's formulas
  • Fulfilment, shipping and subscription operations
  • Retail, wholesale and anything outside paid social and creators

What this plan covers is what I can change inside the ad account and the creator program. Everything outside it is named on the right so nobody assumes it is handled.

Gates, written before spend, so stopping isn’t a negotiation.

Gates at days 14, 30, 60, 90
DayKeep going if (proposed)Stop or change if
Day 14Tracking splits subscribe from one-time orders and 2 creators are live with videos postedTracking is still blended after day 14, so spend pauses until it is fixed
Day 30At least one ad clears the $60.48 guard line and 6 creators are liveNo ad has cleared $60.48 after $14,000 of tests; rework the hooks first
Day 60Blended CAC holds at or under $60.48 on rising spend, with 10 creators liveCAC above $100.80 on any scaled winner for a full week; cut it
Day 90Cohort payback shows repeat orders land inside the $100.80 ceiling at current CACCohorts show a CAC like $110 that never pays back; stop and rebuild

Each gate is checked on its day with the numbers in the daily and weekly reports. If the stop condition is true, the spend stops and nothing renews until we talk.

What exists, what’s missing, and the order that’s forced.

What exists and what is missing
PieceExists todayMissingForced order
claims sheetSite offers: 25% off first order, subscribe up to 29%One sheet of approved claims and wording1st
reportingSubscribe and one-time purchase options on the siteDaily CAC split by subscribe and one-time1st
creativeStrawberry, banana, mint chocolate and vanilla flavorsHook library and 12 new ads a weekWeek 1
creatorsA coffee, protein, energy and meal line to show on cameraTen creators briefed and paid, two at a time2nd
landing pagesProduct pages from $2.00 scoops to $645.00 prepaid bundlesOne page per winning concept, built with your team2nd

The order is forced on purpose: creative and creators come first because they are what moves CAC, and everything else waits for that data.

The experiments, in the order they run.

Experiments by week
WeekExperimentHypothesisWhat it moves
Week 1Review count versus subscribe saving as the opening lineA review count opens colder buyers better than a discount.Keep the winner, kill the loser, test a new saving line.
Week 2Desk-lunch creator format versus gym-shaker formatThe desk-lunch format fits the meal drinks better than the gym format.Brief more creators in the format that wins.
Week 3Soylent complete coffee - mocha versus Soylent complete meal - original as the lead productA coffee drink gets a cheaper first order than a meal drink.Move spend to the lead product that holds the guard line.
Week 4Single $48.00 pack versus 36 bottle bundle at $133.00 as the landing offerThe bundle clears the free shipping line and lowers first-order CAC.Send winning ads to the offer with the lower CAC.
Week 525% off first order versus free shipping over $50 as the hookOne clear offer beats two offers in the same ad.Drop the weaker offer from every live ad.
Week 6Prepaid 3 month plan versus one-time pack on the landing pagePrepaid plans raise first-order revenue enough to shorten payback.Feed the result into the cohort payback report.

Every number, and where it came from.

Every figure with source and type
FigureWhere it came fromType
9,907 Reviews shown on one Soylent ratinghttps://soylent.com/pages/about-soylentFact
29% Top subscription saving shown (up to)https://soylent.com/pages/soylent-new-customer-offerFact
$50 Free shipping threshold on orders overhttps://soylent.com/Fact
Product prices $2.00–$645.00product prices in the site product data (77 products), read 2026-10-06Fact
$126 average order · 40% margin · 1 repeat orderPlaceholders, replaced in week oneAssumed
$60.48 target CAC0.6 of the $100.80 margin per customerCalculated
$100.80 margin per customerPrice × (margin − discount), summed over the ordersCalculated
$24,000 of tests (96 ads × $250)Danilo’s plan, matches Month oneCalculated
0→10 creators in 6 weeks · 7 videos per creator a weekDanilo’s plan, matches Month one and the Creator engineProposed
$100,000 first budget split 24% / 46% / 20% / 10%Danilo’s plan, re-set with the team in week oneCalculated
10% hit rate · $300 a day per winnerPlaceholders, replaced by the first 30 days of testsAssumed
303 creator videos a month at 10 creators10 creators × 7 videos a week × 52 ÷ 12Calculated
$5.74 per 1,000 views against a $1 targetCreator cost over the views the assumptions giveCalculated
$1,000 base pay · $50 bonus past 100,000 viewsDanilo’s planProposed
1,500 median views · 4% breakout (10×) · 0.5% viral (750,000)Placeholders, replaced by the first month of postsAssumed
Pay bands $300–$600, $500–$1,000, $800–$1,500Danilo’s planProposed

Every figure on this page is listed here with where it came from. Fact means read on the site. Assumed and Proposed are Danilo’s own numbers, to be replaced in week one. Calculated is plain arithmetic on those, with the formula shown next to it.

Month one is where it starts.

In week one I build the claims sheet from the Soylent pages, put 1 landing page live, brief the first 2 creators and launch 12 ads at $250 each, one variable per test. Event tracking is the first thing we spec together.

See month oneLet’s chat

Soylent